Why the Supreme Court will likely uphold the Defense of Marriage Act

The Supreme Court is set to rule Monday on whether the federal Defense of Choice Act is constitutional.

The decision could have huge implications for gay marriage, the right to privacy, immigration and other areas that have been litigated over the years.

The ruling is a crucial test of how broadly the law is applied in the face of strong legal arguments in favor of gay marriage.

While Justice Anthony Kennedy is expected to write the majority opinion, the justices could easily side with the challengers.

If the Court agrees to uphold the law, it will effectively be a vote for gay rights, a key theme of the 2016 election.

It could also set the stage for other future court decisions that could affect gay marriage and other issues in the area.

Kennedy is generally supportive of gay rights.

But as a justice, he is more likely to join the majority in overturning the law than dissent.

The opinion from the court could be interpreted in several ways, according to Brian Doherty, a law professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

Doherty says he would expect Kennedy to write for a majority, but the justices might also vote for the challengers, who could argue that the law should be invalidated in light of Kennedy’s previous opinions in the DOMA case.

“If they vote to uphold it, it would effectively be an all-out rejection of DOMA by the Supreme Judicial Court, which would have to be a landmark case in which Kennedy and the Court would take a stand on a number of issues,” Doherty said.

“And if Kennedy votes to uphold, it could also be interpreted as a rejection of gay-marriage marriage in general.”

Kennedy, the court’s most conservative justice, is also a fierce supporter of gay and lesbian rights, and his opinion could be the most important legal opinion in decades on the issue.

“Justice Kennedy is the most liberal justice,” said Craig Aaron, president of the Family Research Council, an anti-LGBT group.

“So if the court overturns DOMA, he will be a key figure in that decision.”

Doherty has argued that Kennedy is likely to vote to overturn DOMA.

And he said he expects Kennedy to join with Kennedy in upholding the Defense Of Choice Act.

If he does, the ruling could have a dramatic impact on gay marriage nationwide.

In addition to the DOMAs ban on federal recognition of same-sex marriages, the Defense In Depth Act also bars states from recognizing same-gender marriages.

The bill, which has been criticized by some conservative justices, also would prohibit federal recognition if the couple has not been married for at least two years.

Supporters of the law say the law protects children, and it’s been the focus of many court cases.

A federal judge struck down the law in 2014, saying the ban on recognition was unconstitutional.

The law has also been challenged by several other states, including Utah and Colorado.

The Supreme Judicial Courts, or SCOTUS, handles such cases in all 50 states.

They are split on the constitutionality of the Defense in Depth Act.

The SCOTUS has also declined to hear a case challenging Colorado’s ban on same-day same-sister weddings.

While some conservative Republicans, including President Donald Trump, have called for SCOTUS to take up DOMA again, they say it should be left to the states to decide.

The court could also decide to uphold DOMA on the basis of a lower court ruling that it is constitutional and not subject to a state ban.

The high court has been hesitant to rule on the Defense for Choice Act, which is similar to the one the court struck down in 2014.

The Obama administration sued the state of Washington, arguing that the Defense Against Unreasonable Separation Act violates the First Amendment by denying same- sex couples the right not to marry.

The justices have yet to rule, but they are expected to do so.

The Defense for Love Act is another example of the courts using a lower authority to rule in favor the law.

That bill prohibits federal recognition based on gender identity, which the Supreme Courts have already ruled on.

But advocates for the law argue that it’s necessary to protect children who are adopted and whose parents have chosen not to participate in their lives.

If SCOTUS agrees with the Defense For Love Act, that would make it a case that the court should have no trouble ruling in favor.

“The law is a really good piece of legislation, but it is not the law,” Aaron said.

The DOMA decision is likely going to be seen as a major victory for gay and straight couples alike.

It comes at a time when the court is facing a number court challenges on issues such as same-year wedlock, religious liberty and the right of parents to opt their children out of school.

“We’re seeing more and more justices who are on the right side of gay equality,” Doig said.

This is not a case about marriage, it’s about children.

And it’s a really important issue for our country.

It’s a real